Monday 16 December 2013

INDIA AGAINST CORRUPTION

PUBLIC NOTICE: This is IAC's Official website. BE CAREFUL OF DECEIVERS
  1. Shri KB "Anna" Hazare was never a part of the India Against Corruption andolan. IAC has never supported the demand for a Lokpal. IAC firmly opposes any Lokpal(s)
  2. India Against Corruption does not permit any usage of its name(s) and title(s) in connection with the 2010-2013 LokPal Bill agitations. All authors and reporters should use "2011 anti-corruption movement" etc. instead of "India Against Corruption" to describe those events.

India Against Corruption ("IAC") is a people's organisation affiliated to the Hindustan Republican Association which was founded on 3 October,1924 at Kanpur (United Provinces). It is today one of the secular "public" faces of the HRA movement as outlined in the Yellow Paper.
The IAC movement today is an apolitical, secular, socialist, Republican, conservative, revolutionary, Hindutva movement.
(NB: Hindutva is an ancient inclusive way of life inherently capable of harmoniously accommodating all faiths, religions and beliefs or non-beliefs).


IAC is exclusively dedicated to its ancient purpose of SWARAJ ie. expelling from Hindustan corrupting foreign colonial rulers along with their agencies and Indian lackeys.
Foreign Rulers: Sonia "Gandhi" &Co.
Foreign Fixers: UIDAI, MNREGA, AID, Ford Foundation, George Soros
Indian Lackeys: Anna Hazare &Co, Arvind Kejriwal &Co, Narendra Modi &Co
India Against Corruption
Leader
Sarbajit Roy
Founded
03-10-1924
Ideology
Poorna Swaraj
Methods
Revolutionary
Membership
Voluntary
Politics"
non-political
HeadQuarter
B-59 Defence Colony
New Delhi 110024
Website
www.indiaagainstcorruption.net.in

ABOUT US:
A public repository of archived documents by IAC's Core Committee members about the India Against Corruption people's movement.
(NB: if any document is marked as public by the uploader, they can be viewed or edited by anybody. All text content on this website's wiki articles can be reproduced under the Creative Commons 3.0 licence as the official existing views / ideology / dogma of the India Against Corruption).

Quicklinks
IAC Manifesto
IAC Charter
IAC mailing list
IAC private site
PUBLIC NOTICE: Carry forward issues for IAC, Kejriwal, Anna Hazare etc.
PUBLIC NOTICE: To IAC's old volunteers now disillusioned with AAP
Minutes of IAC's Annual Meeting 2013
IAC's evidence in Rajya Sabha (RTI Amendment Bill 2013)
IAC submissions to TRAI on Media Ownership
IAC submission to Justice Verma committee
IAC submissions to DERC
NCPRI submissions to Rajya Sabha on RTI Amendment Bill 2013
Anna Hazare. P.B.Sawant Report (RTI version)
PERFIDY of Prashant Bhushan and Arvind Kejriwal in Coalgate
IAC complaint against Anna Hazare and Kiran Bedi

Appeal of a Mother to India's Youth
My dear children,
Hard is the path of patriotism, easy the uttering of speeches. Those who bear service to the Motherland have to bear countless torments
You too should make a deep study of the life and experiences of the patriots. Only then can you find out the correct path of life according to the present circumstances.
My blessings, "Become patriots"
Vidya Wati
(Mother of Shaheed Bhagat Singh)
V&PO Khatkar Kalan
Distt. Jullundur (Panjab)
HRA's Kakori marytrs

1 History


The Pink Paper constituting the original IAC organisation (then known as India Against Colonialism) was drafted under the chairmanship of Sachindranath Sanyal, and adopted along with the Yellow Paper, the Green Paper and the White Paper. Only the Yellow paper was made public, the White Paper emerged during the trial of the Kakori Bomb Conspiracy, and copies of the Pink and Green papers are preserved in the National Archives of India.

On 17 April 1973, the moribund 'India Against Colonialism' body was revived and renamed as India Against Corruption by the HRA leader late Raj Narain for purposes of filing a Writ Petition before the Allahabad High Court.
In coordination with other simultaneous lok andolans in Gujarat (Nav Nirman andolan) and Bihar (Bihar Chhatra Sangharsh Samiti) the movements coalesced into the Sampoorna Kranti (Total Revolution) struggle against Congress Party misrule under Lok Nayak JayaPrakash Narayan (JP) which culminated in the national state of Emergency in 1975 and when HRA was again banned as a terrorist organisation.

2 Objects


  1. The object of the organisation are to establish, through revolution, a Republic of the United States of India under a Federal Constitution of the Republic, enforced by organized and armed committees of citizens in a lawful, democratic and Constitutional manner.
  2. The basic principle of the organisation shall be Universal Suffrage and the abolition of all systems which make any kind of exploitation of man by man possible.

3 Prominent Members


The prominent members of the glorious past include Chittaranjan Das, Lala Hardayal, Raj Chandra Chaudhuri, Lala Kanshi Ram, Ashfaqullah Khan, Ram Prasad Bismil, Jadugopal Mukhupadhyaya, Sachindranath Sanyal, Chandrashekhar Azad, Sachindra Bakshi, Keshab Chakravarthy, Dev Datt Bhattacharya, Bhagat Singh, Rajindra Nath Lahiri, Yogesh Chandra Chatterji, Kali Das Bose, Raj Narain, Lal Bahadur Shastri etc.

4 IAC today


The current IAC (“India Against Corruption”) is an organised synergy of India’s leading anti-corruption and transparency activists who met between 13.Oct.2006-15.Oct.2006 at New Delhi and decided on the spot to form a common platform to combat corruption collectively.
These included many eminent persons associated with the National Campaign for Political Reform in India (NCPRI) which was formed in 2002.
Manoj Pai with Anna Hazare
CJ. Karira with Anna Hazare
This pioneering anti-corruption people’s movement was thereafter reconvened by Sarbajit Roy on 21.Feb.2007 when he had received information of a “tout shop” (@ "Arvind-ki-dukaan’) erected by Arvind Kejriwal outside the Headquarters of the Central Information Commission ("CIC") at New Delhi. Kejriwal was then unemployed and was collecting citizens dissatisfied with the CIC to file RTI requests on behalf of his foreign sponsors. (photo of the illegal kiosk which Kejriwal bribed the local police Rs.2,000 to overlook).
The name “India Against Corruption” was adopted on 26.Feb.2007 outside the CIC office in presence of many NCPRI activists after IAC’s convenor proposed it as a tribute to Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Narayan’s movement which had also initially used the name in the earlier struggle. Roy proposed that the permission to use the IAC name for a movement to monitor accounts of Common Wealth Games 2010 would be obtained from the “Hindustan Republican Army” (action wing of HRA) who were known to him. (photo of foundation day of new IAC movement : Lokesh Batra, Sarbajit Roy, Manish Sisodia, Shekhar Singh, Rekha Koli, Arvind Kejriwal, Veeresh Malik (photographer).)
Accordingly, IAC began filing a series of coordinated Right to Information (RTI)) requests to elicit information from the Government bodies and Games Organising Committees. This took place between 2007 and 2010 and over 11,000 pages of highly damaging information was gathered by a crack team of national activists headed by Roy and Veeresh Malik from Delhi and Pune known as the "HumJanenge" (We shall know).
From its humble beginnings, the IAC people’s movement (‘Jan Andolan’) is today one of the best known international anti-corruption movements.

5 Misuse of name "India Against Corruption"


The public at large is informed that India Against Corruption ("IAC") has never demanded a LokPal (Ombudsman) at any stage. The usage of IAC name was only approved to protest and litigate against the Common Wealth Games 2010 scams in 2010.
At about the same time another organisation "Gandhi Sewa & Satyagraha Brigade - GSSB" had raised demand for Lokpal Bill as well as the return of "Black" Money to India and the confiscation of "black" assets in India. Under deceitful circumstances, GSSB's Lokpal Bill andolan was taken up by so-called "Team Anna", whereas their "Return Black Money to India" andolan was conducted by Baba Ramdev's "Bharat Swabhiman Trust".
NB: Later the GSSB (like HRA) publicly protested that they were deceived and betrayed by Team Anna..
On 2 Oct. 2010, "IAC-HQ" communicated to Sarbajit Roy their in-principle nod that its revolutionary banner of "India Against Corruption" could also be used for a wider popular movement against the excesses of Congress misrule exemplified by massive CWG-2010 scams once the Games concluded on 14 Oct. 2010.
On 18 Oct. 2010, it was proposed at a public meeting that a Delhi based NGO Trust "Public Cause Research Foundation" ("PCRF") having Arvind Kejriwal, Kiran Bedi, Prashant Bhushan, Manish Sisodia etc. as Trustees would act as common "Secretariat" for the diverse andolans and to coordinate with media and for public relations etc. The same day IAC-HQ communicated that its revolutionary banners and images of India Against Corruption martyrs should not be sullied by association with dubious persons like Aruna Roy or Harsh Mander and self-styled Swamis like Ramdev Yadav or "Agnivesh" Vepa Rao who had been invited to the 18.10.2010 meeting. This caused some ripples and Er.Sarbajit Roy withdrew from the andolan to consult with HRA.
On 26 Oct. 2010, a Facebook group page linked to Baba Ramdev titled as "Commonwealth Jhel" then having 3,000 "likes", mischievously changed its name to "India Against Corruption" to fool the public and soon reached 25,000 likes. A few days later its owner Shivendra Chauhan sold its passwords to Team Arvind to promote Arvind's new personality cult and stayed on to manage it. Chauhan is now with the BJP.
Deceitful events of 14 November 2010 at Connaught Place

On 14 Nov. 2010, a complaint was lodged in Parliament Street Police station on behalf of "India Against Corruption" against the CWG scams. It only contained about 200 pages of the over 7,000 pages evidencing wrongdoing gathered by IAC using RTI from various Govt bodies, as the balance were withheld to PCRF by IAC due to mounting mistrust over the direction of the andolan. Another 150 pages were provided by activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal (seen beside Anna in pic). The Delhi Police did not register any cognisable offence on this complaint which was shoddily drafted on purpose to deceive the citizens through paid media.


That same evening a public rally was organised by Baba Ramdev's 'Bharat Swabhiman Trust' titled as "People's War Against Corruption" attended by Anna Hazare and some Muslim clerics like Maulana Syed Kalbe, whom Ramdev was promoting after the Deobandis had distanced from Ramdev. Arvind Kejriwal spoke for about 30 minutes on various national scams but hardly touched on CWG scam or the irrefutable scam evidence available to the andolan. IAC felt betrayed & deceived, but expressed its fury privately that the usage of its name and banners could not now be tolerated for attempts to dilute the focus of the protest and divert the public anger into cul-de-sacs like LokPal Bill.

Press Conference 01/Dec/2010 (NSCI)
On 17 Nov. 2010, the PCRF unilaterally registered the domain name of "www.indiaagainstcorruption.org" to call a press conference (arranged and paid for by Bharat Swabhiman Trust of controversial medicine man Baba Ramdev) on 01 Dec. 2010 at "National Sports Club of India" (New Delhi).
At the meeting on 01 Dec. 2010, when asked about status of the criminal Writ Petition to be filed by "India Against Corruption" for non-registration of a FIR by Delhi Police on 14.10.2010, Kiran Bedi feigned ignorance of it and mentioned that the LokPal Bill agitation of Anna Hazare is now being conducted under the IAC banner (which had actually never been previously discussed nor agreed with HRA). Anna Hazare then also announced to the media that "India Against Corruption" is the name for his LokPal andolan.
(L-R): Arvind Kejriwal, Kiran Bedi, Sunita Godara (standing), Sri Sri Ravi Shankar, KB "Anna" Hazare, Vepa "Aginivesh" Rao, BR Lall (standing)'
On 07 Dec. 2010, Arvind also used the name "India Against Corruption" in his blogpost, and used it to propagate the "Jan Lokpal Bill" agitation. The name of IAC was also used thereafter to complete various formalities with the local authorities for a rally on 30.Jan. 2011 on Gandhi's birthdate. From this time onwards and with no explanations forthcoming from Arvind, IAC-HQ withdrew permission to Team Arvind (then being tagged in the media as "Team Anna") to use IAC's name and banners.
IAC has repeatedly clarified the mischievous reporting by media as under:-
  1. At no stage was PCRF authorised to represent itself to be India Against Corruption organisation, (and they did not)
  2. At no stage was Shri KB "Anna" Hazare even a primary member of IAC let alone its leader, (and Anna has never claimed to be either)
  3. At no stage did any person connected with PCRF have any authority to use name of IAC for anything other than CWG-2010 agitation, (this resulted from temporary breakdown in communications as HRA is a private body with its own agenda).
IAC is not a Gandhian organisation and had taken serious exception to misuse of its revolutionary banners to promote pseudo-Gandhian philosophies during the popular agitations. However, the paid media (such as Times of India) which was funding Team Anna's andolan chose not to report it.

5.1 Events from 10 Nov. 2012


On 10 Nov. 2010 Kiran Bedi brought Anna Hazare to Delhi to lay claim to the India Against Corruption brand name. It was mischievously reported in paid online media that Arvind Kejriwal "who had left the movement 2 months back had agreed to give the IAC name to his 'guru'". At the morning conference Anna posed as founder of IAC and told reporters "The movement of India Against Corruption was launched by me to fight corruption". "On the issue of using the name IAC, Hazare said if Kejriwal-led group gives it, he will take it.". Hazare also said earlier his photos were on IAC's banners.
Immediately on 10 Nov. 2012 evening, after a furious HRA reminded Kejriwal of his agreements, the following press statement was issued on behalf of Team Arvind from the official email ID of IAC <ash.ashwati2012@gmail.com>
PRESS RELEASE / 10.November.2012
on behalf of
The India Against Corruption national anti-corruption movement

India Against Corruption has noted reports being published and circulated in various newpapers and media channels stating that Shri Arvind Kejriwal has agreed that the name "India Against Corruption" will be exclusively used by Shri Anna Hazare ji and funds will be collected in name of "India Against Corruption" in a bank account to be opened by Smt. Kiran Bedi & Ors. It has also been imputed therein that Shri Arvind Kejriwal would have no objection to Anna Hazare ji exclusively using the India Against Corruption name, banner etc. if he was asked to relinquish his rights, claims and titles in the India Against Corruption and IAC brand names in favour of Shri Anna Hazare ji.
It is clarified as follows:
1) The brand names "India Against Corruption" and "IAC" and all exclusive titles and rights therein neither vests with Shri Arvind Kejriwal nor with Shri Anna Hazare ji or with any other definitely settled person or organisation.
2) India Against Corruption states that all graphics, logos, and brand names of the India Against Corruption movement were placed in the public domain and free of copyright a long time ago by their authors and creators. In view of this ground reality it is very well known to all concerned parties that there was never any copyrighted trademark or logo for India Against Corruption as the same could not be done.
3) No money has been collected till now only in the name of India Against Corruption and certainly no duly accounted for receipts have been issued in the name of India Against Corruption. For anyone to say that somebody like Shri Arvind Kejriwal would relinquish the rights and accounts in IAC to anybody else would necessarily imply that funds meant for the IAC have been exclusively collected by him until now. This is not the case. It is also very well settled in law that a person can only relinquish or transfer his definite title and defined shares.
4) Shri Anna Hazare ji was not associated with the IAC movement initially, He associated himself later on. Smt Kiran Bedi and Ms. Sunita Godara were also initial volunteers of the IAC movement, but ranked pari-passu with Shanti Bhusha ji, Shri Prasant Bhushan, Shri Arvind Kejriwal & many other selfless IAC volunteers. As such the claim that Shri Arvind Kejriwal left the IAC movement 2 months back to form a political party is false, mischievous and without any foundation. Shri Kejriwal may issue his own personal statement concerning this.
5) India Against Corruption was never an hierarchial organisation. That would be undemocratic and against everything IAC stands for.
6) Shri Anna Hazare ji under the cover of people's protests organised under the banner of India Against Corruption and financed by duly accounts funds of the PCRF and other social organisations has earned crores of rupees from sale of branded merchandise like shirts, caps and other articles with slogans like "I am Anna" by his volunteers. The IAC has not received even 1 rupee from such sales which had nothing to do with IAC. The Indian public hopes that accounts for such huge revenues would be rendered to them by the people who expect to collect and manage IAC's funds in the future.
Ash
National Spokesperson
"India Against Corruption" anti-corruption people's movement

5.2 Kiran Bedi leaves IAC formally


On 24 Dec. 2012, after repeated queries by IAC District coordinators to account for large sums of money given to her in cash for funding IAC movement, Kiran Bedi resigns from India Against Corruption through an email posted to IAC public mailing lists.

5.3 Gen V.K Singh asserts IAC is still "firmly" with Anna


Bedi's stance keeps changing. IAC is firmly with Anna. Rally on 30th is of the masses and IAC is part of it.
Vk
Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel
Anna is with IAC but the IAC is not with him
"... We would also request you to personally ensure that no misuse of the India Tricolor takes place on the occasion and the flag code is strictly adhered to. As a fauji I am sure you would appreciate the sentiment we patriots attach to it. Shri.Anna Hazare is an old offender of regularly dishonoring the flag on such occasions and it is only our magnanimity that he and Dr Kiran Bedi are not behind bars for the same."
Subject: Re: [IAC#RG] Basic ingredients of IAC
Hello Gen VK
Since last 3 months Anna has done nothing for IAC and has not contacted IAC coordinators. All he doing is creating confusion in mind of public. Dos he have any action plan, if so what it is ? Now there is no need or hope for Lokpal Bill. That phase of IAC movement is over and nobody wants Lokpal Bill not even NCPRI.
We had also collected over Rs. 28 lakhs which was given to IAC for Anna through Kiran Bedi. Team Arvind is not replying to us how the money was used, they say we should contact Anna Hazare, Kiran Bedi or anyone else we care in IAC as they were collecting funds for PCRF not for IAC If you have any idea about our money, please inform us or return the same to us immediately with interest.
Mohd Raaz Baig
IAC (NCPRI) Coordinator
Lot of confusion being created about IAC only by Kiran Bedi because we're asking her about where all the money collected from IAC West Bengal totaling more then 28 lakh disappeared.
Everyday she was changing her story not coming on phone. A group of us come to Delhi and go to her house and basement office in Udday Park. For 3 days she don't meet us and young girls in her office tell us lies. We find that she is using the money into Anna's new office which while rented by Vicky Donor producer was 5 lakh rupee per month. The landlord is Congress worker and very close to Bedi. Then we ask where the rent money is coming from, they tell some "anonymous" donor has given 12 lacs for paying the rent of 1 lac per month.
There is no anonymous donation, it is stolen money of poor people of Bengal and Kiran Bedi, Anna and VeekY are only Congress persons and stealing our money. Howe many other states she has done same cheating will come out in police investigation.
Mohd Raaz Baig
IAC (NCPRI) Coordinator

5.4 Anna Hazare drops claim to IAC brand name


Having fought a bitter battle with Arvind Kejriwal for the India Against Corruption name, the new Team Anna will not work under that banner any more. Anna Hazare's NGO in Ralegan Siddhi, Bhrashtachar Virodhi Jan Andolan Nyas, will henceforth be the platform from which he and his team will hold programmes. The office at Sarvodaya Enclave here, which had been the bone of contention between volunteers and core team, will wind up by the end of this month. The Ralegan Siddhi office, opened on January 12, will be the centre of the movement. A call will be taken at a later date on a Delhi branch office, if required.
It is curious that having wrested the name from Kejriwal, the new Team Anna is all set to drop the brand altogether.

6 Core Committee


IAC Core Committee meeting 03.09.2013
IAC is managed by the Core Committee which regularly reports to Hindustan Republican Association ("IAC-HQ") through the National Convenor.


Er. Sarbajit Roy (National Convenor)
Mr. Veeresh Malik (Co-Convenor)
Er. C.J. Karira (Co-Convenor)
Mr. Manoj Pai
Mr. Hitendra Parihar
Mr. Muzib-Ur Rehman
Er. N.S. Venkatraman
Dr. Sandeep Gupta
Mr. Harikumar Bharatiya

7 Official statement on formation of Aam Aadmi Party


At IAC's Core Committee meeting on 03.09.20103 the following agreed statement was issued concerning deamalgamation of politically inclined persons fighting corruption under IAC's banner.
a) It was publicly announced on 02 August 2012 evening by Sh. Arvind Kejriwal and his friends who were on an “indefinite fast” under the banner of “India Against Corruption” that the national anti-corruption movement would take a political nature/turn including by forming a political party and contesting elections.
b) This unilateral announcement by Arvind Kejriwal met with considerable internal opposition within IAC movement (which is ideologically against direct participation in politics). Arvind’s announcement was viewed by IAC as a device to distract from the popular dissatisfaction with demand for Lokpal Bill after overuse of methods like satyagraha and repeated fasting (anshan) caused IAC to lose public support across India.
c) In the surcharged atmosphere, a series of public disagreements between the “political” and “apolitical” groups of IAC were being reported in the media affecting the IAC’s reputation. The IAC’s social networking sites and mailing lists were also hacked, manipulated and misused to wrongly project that the public mood wanted IAC to go political. IAC members and the public at large were being subjected to a barrage of propaganda and were tremendously confused by the “split”.
d) IAC HQ decided that the movement shall remain apolitical, and “Team Arvind” would exit by/on 2 October 2012 after announcing the name of their party which would be different from India Against Corruption’s. The cyber war, however, still continued.
e) It was in these circumstances that social activist Er. Sarbajit Roy was inducted by IAC’s HQ on 17 Oct 2012 to resolve the cyber warring and settle the issue of who would retain / use the India Against Corruption brand, which was entrusted to him pende lis, while the funds collection issues were being simultaneously resolved.
f) On 26th October 2012 it was mutually conveyed/agreed to IAC HQ that Arvind and his faction would completely exit from IAC, give up their claims to the IAC name and form their political party with a substantially different name by 26th November 2012. It was also agreed that announcements and campaigns made in the period between 26.10.2012 and 25.11.2012 would not bind / devolve on the other.
g) It was agreed in principle that the funds collected by Team Arvind till 25th Nov.2012 and with them could be held by them and Team Arvind would be responsible for rendering / settling the accounts to whoever required it.
h) From 26th Oct 2012 onwards Er. Sarbajit Roy is nominated as “National Convenor” by IAC HQ to be the public face of the IAC movement. Er. Roy in turn is selecting and nominating the eminent citizens and RTI activists of India known for their integrity and competence to be the IAC’s core committee members on a voluntary basis.
i) Team Arvind have generally complied with their assurances and on 24.Nov.2012 have floated their organization under name and style of “Aam Aadmi Party” w.e.f 26.Nov.2012 and their erstwhile IAC website www.indiaagainstcorruption.org was duly disabled by them. Meanwhile on 02.Nov.2012 Er.Roy had booked and started the new IAC official website as www.indiaagainstcorruption.net.in For operational and security reasons the official website is presently redirected to the IAC’s Core Committee crabgrass portal - securely hosted on Riseup’s activist platform.

8 Statement of National Convenor on Jan Tantra Morcha


The following public statement was issued on 16.01.2013 by IAC in reply to a request to support Gen (Retd.) V.K.Singh under banner of Jan Tantra Morcha after "Anna Hazare had left the IAC".
IAC had previously been outraged at juxtaposition of images of HRA's martyrs/shaheeds Bhagat Singh, Sukhdev etc, with those of Vivekananda and Gandhi at public performances by Anna Hazare's troupe with obscene dances, public disrespect to national flag and consumption of alcohol as at a function held at Nashik on 24.May.2012 to raise money for Anna.

Pertaining to your remarks on Anna Hazare leaving IAC, Mr Anna Hazare was never a part of the IAC. He is a duffer and character actor who was massively overpaid for his walk on appearances. Like every cheap character actor he is never seen after sun-down ;-). In fact an inverse Keshto Mukherjee.
What was Anna Hazare before Team Arvind elevated him to National status in 2011 ? In rural Maharashtra his travelling circus is well known for its set routine for which they are paid between 50,000 and 1 lakh for their night shows.
Act 1: Some Comedian and poetry reading with cheap dialogues. Public starts getting in the mood and slowly opening their bottles.
Act-2: Tamasha / Lavani troupe with all Jhatak Mataks (see attached picture) . This carries on for 1 hour. Public is nicely sozzled by now and dancing in front of stage (and also on stage).
20 minute interval to cool crowd down.
Act-3: Some local politician / sponsor comes on stage and makes introductory remarks about Desh Bhakti / Bhagat Singh etc. and appeals to noble nature of crowd and imagery of Bharat Mata and brings on ANNA.
Act-4: ANNA THE GREAT makes his standard 20 minute speech including on evils of alcohol. This is the signal for the public to start weaving their way out from the venue.
All the while the venue is disrespectfully festooned with the Indian Flag at night.
And you want us to support such people whom your General associates with ?
Sarbajit
National Convenor
India Against Corruption jan andolan

Thursday 20 June 2013

On Sanjeev Sabhlok armchair statesman

I find nothing admirable or worthy in these armchair statesmen remotely denouncing Ramdev on specious and questionable grounds, decontextualizing a few details of his head-on confrontation with the Congi fascists, such as trying to avoid capture, wearing women's clothes etc., and criticizing the man for not living up to THEIR standards of leadership, standards which they themselves seem quite incapable of putting into practice in the world of bricks and mortar, muck and mire. I'm not saying Ramdev is perfect, but I'd take him any day over these clueless online Maharathis who would rather launch missiles at the good guys rather than uniting against the common foe who has today shown to what extent she is willing to go in brutalizing the native sons of India's soil.

Such senseless finger-pointing seems to be in line with most other egocentric claptrap that is standard fare from India's self-preening neo-Angrez elites. To them Baba Ramdev is a throwback and an anachronism and India itself a rudderless ship that needs to catch up with America by becoming some sort of caricature of the U.S.A. Intellectually fattened on a steady diet of American pseudo-psycholigists and pop-philosophers like Ayn Rand and Stephen Covey, these worthies live in their own manufactured reality in which they are the "leaders" and "netas" the blighted country has been waiting for. The web has given their ambitions a safe outlet to FEEL like the great souls that they are convinced they are within… if only the world would pay them the attention they deserve.

I wish them all the best but will not stand and watch them casting rotten tomatoes from the stands at the real players in this difficult and dangerous arena.

Wednesday 5 June 2013

"Baba Ramdev the coward" - Sanjeev Sabhlok

Sanjeev Sabhlok you corrupt cow killer

Deny This now FUCKWIT !!!!!

(why have you deleted the link from your blog)

Does the cross-dressing Baba know about this blogpost of yours ?

Baba Ramdev the coward

On June 6, 2011, in Current Affairs, India, by Sanjeev Sabhlok

Sitting in Melbourne it is hard to get fresh info on what is going on in India. Supratim alerted me to a shocking piece of info just a few minutes ago, re: Baba Ramdev's behaviour upon being arrested:

A person who jumped into a group of women and girl volunteers, to shield himself from the Police. A person who left all his aides to the tender mercies of the cops while running away personally. A person finally arrested in the dress of a woman (Salwar-kameez!), skulking outside a railway station. What kind of a martyr is he, one who would leave his followers, while trying to save his own skin? Tilak, Gokhale, Gandhi, Bose would all lead their own andolans and take the first blow themselves. Not so for this yoga guru with mighty pretensions.

I quickly confirmed at least most of this here. And here

Till a few minutes ago I was at least under the favorable impression about the Baba, that he'd be considered to be a martyr by the people of India – for the way he was treated.

But no! I was wrong.

He is a COWARD.

I suddenly was reminded of the quality of leaders we had in our independence movement, and what we have today.

One the one hand we had Lala Lajpat Rai, the LION of Panjab, who died as a result of the lathis of the British police. He would not BUDGE. Lathis or anything. He was a LION. His conviction in his ideas was supreme.

On the other hand I can visualise this Baba Ramdev character, fleeing from arrest (he should have COURTED arrest, if he had the courage of conviction for what he was fighting). Worse, he changed quickly into the dress of a woman. A mouse, this man.

Now, I have nothing against cross-dressers, but then he HID inside a group of women. Getting women to shield him!!! That shows the true nature of his courage.

बुज़दिल!

This Baba is FINISHED.

I'm sorry. Baba. If you don't have the conviction of conscience, don't  enter the public space. 

And if you are afraid of death, then don't try to save India.

Baba, go home. Do your yoga. You are UNFIT to enter politics.

Addendum

I have been very patient and considerate towards Baba Ramdev and IAC, despite good grounds to have dissociated with these movements even earlier. I have even offered to work together with these movements should they change their policy stance. But I simply don't tolerate cowardice. That is worse – MUCH WORSE – than corruption.

Addendum 2

I've made two follow-up posts on this subject:

a) I'm withdrawing my support for "India Against Corruption"

b) What is honourable behaviour? What are the kinds of leaders?



Sanjeev Sabhlok's reactionary blog

This is an Important FAQ containing the policy of this (web)log  "Sanjeev Sabhlok's reactionary blog"

I, the "owner" of this blog am "Sanjiv Sabhlok" and I reside in Australia working as a Chartered Financial Accountant with a leading international Bank.

Due to irrational algorithms of some search engines like "Google", my real world identity has been turned into a nightmare by a moron and psycho,  the  synonymously named "Sanjeev" Sabhlok, who spews his nonsense over the internet through a vast network of interlinked blogs and SEO optimized websites claiming inter alia to be an economist.

DISCLAIMER : 2 years ago Sanjeev Sabhlok claimed I impersonated him on the website of "The Economist" magazine by posting comments using my Yahoo mail ID, and my Yahoo mail account was terminated, causing me to then register the email ID "sanjeev_sabhlok@yahoo.com.au" where I can also be contacted. I am also the registered user of mail IDs like "sabhlokcity" etc. which I am entitled to register.

This Weblog is a "reaction"ary blog where I "react" (as an Indian, proud Hindu and highly qualified professional) to the intellectual garbage which the "psycho" Sanjeev Sabhlok pumps out 24x7. As a reaction to these, I collect from the Internet what other hundreds of pissed off net users write about Sanjeev Sabhlok's abusive postings / psychotic rantings, and I analyse them (and usually clean them up) and post them up with my comments. That is what a WEBLOG's official role is (please see Wikipedia).

So to sum up:-

1) I am Sanjiv Sabhlok from Melbourne Australia commenting on what my nakesake Sanjeev Sabhlok who also stays in Australia publishes and which tend to defame me. Yes, I know this is "coincidence" and the odds of it happening are a miillion to 1.

2) I am exercising my legal right (also known as LIBERTY and FREE SPEECH in most democracies) to issue fair comment on what Sanjeev Sabhlok, a public figure as he is the founder of a political party in India, publishes in the public domain which is affecting my own reputation as a competent finance professional in a highly conservative business environment. If Sanjeev allowed me to comment on his blogs without his usual censorship I would be happy to do so, causing me to post minimally to blogs such as this.

3) I shall delete within 48 hours any material on this site which is factually incorrect, or violative of terms and conditions agreed to between myself and the concerned Service Provider/s when it is brought to my notice through email.

4) I am not IMPERSONATING Sanjeev Sabhlok because in our native Indian languages (Sanskrit) our names are identical ('Sanjv').

Re: [SKC] Fuckwit extraordianaire

Shriman Suresh Chiplunkar
Namaste

The authors of these abusive message can be traced by following the links.

There are 100's of people abused by Sanjeev Sabhlok on his blog who are fed up and now getting back at him through this mailing list.

Please read the article below and see what words you will use for proud non-Hindu foreign capitalist Sanjeev Sabhlok who wants to privatise beef industry in India using Australian abbotoir technology and to export abundantly cheap and surplus Indian cows to be slaughtered.

He has even floated a new party "Swarna Bharat Party" for this purpose and collected about 36 rascals in a so called "Freedom Team of India" to fight elections which will be financed by Baba Ramdev to set up a cow butchery in J&K, the meat will be sold to be eaten by locals, the urine and bones and hooves will be "rendered" and used to make certain ayurvedic preparations and dog food.

Baba Ramdev's irrational demand to prohibit cow slaughter

My view is very simple. The cow is food in all parts of the world (except for a few Hindus and Jains in India), and Hindus ate the cow for thousands of years till the influence of the Jains made them change their mind. 

Regardless of that, I don't expect the state to dictate what food a person may or may not eat. I don't expect it to create a law that you SHOULD eat beef, for instance.

The ONLY reason the state can impose its views on such matters is if you harm others in this process, or if doing so will harm the environment.

The cow is not a scarce animal. Plenty of cows exist and plenty more can be produced as needed. The tiger is a genuine scarce animal and being at the top of the ecological food chain of the jungle, the dying out of tigers can severely damage the natural environment. For instance if tigers die then all forests will be ravaged and destroyed by plant eating animals. Hence for tigers a different policy applies.

But the policy on tigers (see my article on the environment) does not ask that you don't kill tigers. It asks for tigers (indeed jungles) to be privatised and reared just like any other animal. Wherever wildlife has been privatised (Coase theorem will show you how it works), it has flourished.

There are innumerable instances of the truth of this theorem. There is, for instance, no threat of extinction of crocodiles in Australia since crocodile farms are licensed to grow them and sell their meat and skin. It is a highly profitable business. Eg. see this.

I respect yours or Baba Ramdev's right NOT to eat beef IF you so feel (on any ground, call it moral if you wish), but I REFUSE to have you impose your will through the state on this matter. That involves the TOTAL DESTRUCTION of freedom.

You will first have to prove to me that eating beef is harmful. The entire world except a few Hindus in India eats beef, and they haven't died. Note that Indians ate beef for thousands of years till the Jain influence grew strong. They didn't die. And I know of MANY MANY Indians who eat beef outside India. They aren't dying. So what's the problem? Food is supposed to nourish. What you or I or anyone else puts into our own mouths is none of the business of others.

If eating beef is not lethal and it doesn't kill others, then there is no cause to interfere in the freedoms of others to eat beef. I think Baba Ramdev is trying to impose HIS version of morality on the rest of the world. That amounts to dictatorship. Let him learn to respect others. 

He is welcome not to kill cows for food. But let him please learn the basics of freedom.

Regards

Sanjeev

ADDENDUM

1) That Indians ate beef in the past is well documented, e.g. by Gandhi, Nehru, and also in a detailed book: Jha's Myth of the Holy Cow.

2) I believe animals must be treated respectfully and have clarified in detail in Chapter 4 of DOF. That does not mean that we elevate them to a pedestal equal to us.

3) It is a huge disincentive for farmers to raising cows in India (and hence most are KILLED UPON BIRTH) because they can't sell them freely in the market, except for milk, which they hardly produce any. What the Baba Ramdev policy will do is to ensure that MORE COWS ARE KILLED AT BIRTH. Is that what he wants? And why does he want to harm the Indian farmer who may well earn a decent livelihood by selling cows for meat? 

4) Do you want to see how a cow should be treated and respected? Then visit Australian farms. You'll find cows allowed to roam freely and widely over a vast expanse of grass; their needs catered to carefully; their health monitored by veterinarians (who are paid MORE than doctors). And when they are taken to abbatoirs, the regulations require a very specific and humane way of killing them for meat. Compare with the way cows are often treated in India – with the GREATEST DISRESPECT, driven from one garbage heap to another, forced to live a sad and tragic life before finally being sold in underhand ways to people who will kill them without the slightest mercy and without access to modern machines. Want to show respect for something? Then privatise it. The owner will show it respect if it becomes an economic good.


On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Suresh Chiplunkar <suresh.chiplunkar@gmail.com> wrote:
I dont know who wrote this CRAP, but this type of language reminds me the Gutter language of Salman Rushdie. What a hate towards Mr. Sabhlok that one could not find a word other than FUCK. Just pity.


On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:48 PM, SoneKe Chidiya <sonekechidiya@gmail.com> wrote:
The Baba & the Bureaucrat- Impossibility of an Indian Liberal Part II

Sanjeev Sabhlok is a former IAS Babu now working for the Australian Govt fucking up the Global Environment big time.

--
सुरेश चिपलूनकर
(Suresh Chiplunkar)
http://blog.sureshchiplunkar.com

Fuckwit extraordianaire

The Baba & the Bureaucrat- Impossibility of an Indian Liberal Part II

Sanjeev Sabhlok is a former IAS Babu now working for the Australian Govt fucking up the Global Environment big time.

His slogan is something like 'jab Sarkar khud kare vyaapaari, to Desh ke logon bane bhikari 'when the Government turns to keeping shop, Into destitution the people drop'- i.e. the Govt. ought not to run enterprises better managed by the private sector. It's a simplistic slogan but not notably more so than any other and might even have been meaningful some time prior to 1974 which was the last occasion when any Economist could plausibly argue that the reverse might be the case. I choose the year 1974 advisedly, because till that time it did look as though Coal would do better, or not quite as crap, under the Govt. Indeed, till that date, it was possible to envision a not utterly shit Industrial proletariat whose militancy might be muted by reason of the elimination of the evil capitalist and Public Ownership of the Enterprise.

Hey! Who knew the Indian worker would turn out to be as shite as the Indian bureaucrat or the Indian Economist or Indian Politician? At least the 'proletarian vanguard'- in the Coal and Iron and other 'commanding heights' industries- had a chance to show they were worthless rubbish at the comparatively low tariff of fucking over their sons rather than shedding any of their own precious blood, not to mention sweat, pretending they were genuine Commies or Stakhanovites or whatever was fashionable back then.

Still, India's bizarre labour and bankruptcy laws- its utterly mad notion of 'sick' units- meant that Civil Servant-run Public Enterprises were still somewhat less crap when compared, like against like, with Private sickies promoted by utter shitheads and cow-worshiping buffoons.

Sabhlok, a manic exhibitionist of his own appalling ignorance, might be forgiven for not knowing about this.

What is odd, indeed richly comic, is to see him lined up behind Baba Ramdev- a supposed Holy Man turned merchant, now seeking a political role- whose main claim to fame is his 'Educationally backward caste status' and carefully cultivated image of rural imbecility.

It appears that Sabhlok's vaunted 'Classical Liberalism'- which views Govt. owned Enterprises as evil- has no problem with God-men turning merchant or even turning into power brokers. Extraordinarily enough, Sabhlok quotes the Arthashastra as a source for his views. Yet, Chanakya is perfectly orthodox in his strictures on Religion. In the Arthashastra, or Manu Smriti, or any other such ancient Indian text, whereas the State is given the monopoly of certain industries as well as eminent domain and regulatory powers w.r.t various guilds and corporations, Religion is very strictly prohibited from any sort of simoniac commerce or  mercenary trafficking.  Precisely for that reason, both Shraman and Brahmin were prohibited any means of livelihood, other than the seeking of alms. Indeed, bogus Babas, quacks, alchemists and the like- though used as spies against the enemy- enjoyed no toleration save that of summary execution.

Sabhlok tells Baba's audience that he is not a Hindu- get rid of Caste and then maybe I'll consider it, is what the acharabrashta cunt says- so, I take it, his praise of the Baba arises from no personal piety or other such excusable soteriological motive but is solely dictated by the success of the God-man's money making schemes- in particular some imported Swiss machinery that is used in his 'Ayurvedic' food processing facility, which, for some reason,  the fuckwit Sabhlok thinks makes the product 'swadesi' (i.e. produced with indigenous technology).

The problem here is that we have no way of knowing if Baba Ramdev's commercial ventures are actually profitable. It is entirely possible that the losses are being covered by the diversion of donated funds. Secondly, even if the Baba's Ayurvedic business is profitable, we don't know whether this is because it is commercially viable in itself or whether this is a 'rent' accruing to the Baba's charisma- i.e. the product commands a premium based entirely on the Baba's endorsement- or else is simply a case of 'primitive accumulation'- the Baba may have simply stolen the land, fucked over his suppliers and indulged in accounting chicanery.

Sanjeev Sabhlok is a bureaucrat not an Accountant so perhaps his naivety in this matter is par for the course. What is decidedly odd is that he has rushed to associate himself with a God-man who has questions to answer regarding unjust enrichment, most notably in connection with the disappearance of his own Guru. 

Tulsi Das wrote-
Brahmo Gyaan binu naari nara kehahin na doosari baata
KauRi laagi lobha basa karahin bipra Guru ghaata!
(Now, Everyman, Everywoman, but vies for the high Advaitic strain
Tho' for a farthing's favour they'd chop their own Guru in twain!)

What of Sabhlok's own Guru parampara?- assuming he owns any such thing- has he kept faith with his teachers or killed them all off to make a quick buck? I see from his Wikipedia entry that the Indian tax payer paid for his PhD (that too in Economics! ) from the University of Southern California which is considered fairly conservative and reputable. Incidentally, I should mention, Sabhlok's father appears to have been a highly educated man steeped in Indian traditional culture and values. No doubt he was tremendously pleased when Sabhlok, having got his American PhD on the Indian tax payer's dime fucked off to Australia and acquired that country's citizenship as soon as he could do so.

I had heard that this worthless cunt is only kept in Govt. in Australia because he is a worthless shit and advises the plundering of that great country's resources by any fucking cunt wot pays off the politicians. Being a fucking 'abo' look-alike or 'blackie', this ignorant turd is useful because any liberal who objects can be accused of 'racism'.

Fuck you Sabhlok- worthless illiterate cunt that you are.

Anyway, getting back to what we were talking about- why is this shithead Sabhlok basking in the crooked smile of this shifty looking Ramdev Baba?  Money?

Sabhlok isn't smart enough to extort money from that fellow- he'll be lucky to get out of that Ashram with the chaddi on his buttocks.

Perhaps, Australia wants him to fuck up the Indian Coal industry so as to increase their own exports? Plausible, but Sabhlok is a witless shithead. Read his books. (Don't. They're shit) Who would trust him with any such project?

The truth is, unlike Baba Ramdev, who probably only killed off his own Guru to gain land and wealth, rather than as a matter of principle, Indian 'Classical Liberals' like Sabhlok will kill their Gurus just for a chance to make a public spectacle of themselves and even pay a premium for the privilege. No doubt, as a high strung type (but great unconscious comic) Sabhlok found relief from some imaginary ailment by doing some bogus 'Yogic' exercise or taking some quack remedy of the Baba's and, if so, it may be, in foro conscientiae,  the imputation  of egregious bad faith to him is defeated and his conduct stands testimony merely to his own feeble mindedness rather than something generic and relating to the ideological position he claims to espouse.

Master charlatan Baba Ramdev, FTI's idiotic founder Sanjeev Sabhlok

FTI's sham of an 'exoneration' of Baba Ramdev

Freedom Team India (FTI) has been falling over itself in the race to cover its tracks in the incredible saga of the about-turn of its dictator, Sanjeev Sabhlok (SS) falling into the swoon, embrace and bed-fellowship of master charlatan, Baba Ramdev.

It appears that till sometime in 2011, Sanjeev Sabhlok was a very strong and virulent critic of Baba Ramdev and the culmination of his total switch to joining the band-wagon of 'Bharat Swabhiman' movement in the speeches he delivered at Patanjali Yogapeeth is causing many red faces within its own ranks 

One the comments below from their own blog posts says it all

abhishek says:

Sanjeev Sabhlok you had been a staunch critic of Swami Ramdev, now sharing stage with him; what a great u-turn ?

Here's Sanjeev Sabhlok's feeble defense and saccharine praise of the 'Baba'

"I've never come across a person as brilliant, physically fit, and humble (and willing to learn) as Swami Ramdev. A level 5 leader, he has left a deep mark on me, and forced me to consider the many benefits of the original system of education in India."

Really!!! Baba Ramdev and humble and humility???!!!!.

It is hard to say who Sanjeev Sabhlok is trying to fool here. It would have to be himself and his motley crowd of FTI slaves and footmen (there are thankfully hardly any women in the FTI group). 

I don't know what Sanjeev Sabhlok means by Level 5 leader. If this is some leadership jargon, Sanjeev Sabhlok did not care to explain. And what is the original system of education in India?

 Again though there are no answers from the FTI 'commander-in-chief', one can only infer that he must be alluding to the Gurukul system of teaching/learning. But the moot point to consider is whether Baba Ramdev is really a  product of Gurukul system of education. And also whether such a system formally exists in post-British India. Is Ramdev anymore a product of 'Gurukooling' (the ancient Indian school where students drink the Guru-worship Kool-Aid), than Sri Sri or Chinmayananda are!!.

To infer and assume the excellence of Indian ancient/Gurukul systems from the tainted success of Ramdev is indeed a very huge leap of faith, presumption and credulity that only the likes of Sanjeev Sabhlok and FTI hangers-on can make.

Let me now quote the red-faced and embarrassing retraction of Sanjeev Sabhlok about his hostility to Ramdev and even to Anna Hazare

"Given that my previous views were formed on the basis of press reports, I've made private (i.e. invisible to the world) a few of my blog posts, particularly those in which I have raised questions similar to what Anna Hazare has raised today. (Today Anna Hazare has suggested that Ramdev is associated with communal organisations.) I wish I had time to review those posts individually, but at this stage I've just made them private."

"As I get to know Baba Ramdev better personally, I'm able to assure Anna with confidence that Ramdev is not communal. That matter can, I believe, be firmly put to rest."
 
Lo and Behold! Baba Ramdev is no longer a communal instigator and Anna Hazare, no longer the failed Gandhian wannabe and two of the most arch foes of the Don Quixote of FTI, are now his dearest bed-fellows!!!.

Sancho Panza's of the FTI! (there are a few hundreds of them) save yourselves more embarrassment and disgrace that is sure to follow!!

As I referred in my earlier post on this topic, Sanjeev Sabhlok has made himself the self-appointed arbiter of Baba Ramdev's character, past  and actions

Here is the pompous 'judicial' pronouncement of the 'Chief Justice' of  the FTI kangaroo court, Shri. Sanjeev Sabhlok on Ramdev's bona fides:

"Swami Ramdev is merely spreading the best that is found in Indian systems. There is TOTAL integrity in his systems."

"I've satisfied myself entirely that Swami Ramdev is totally above board. There is no issue of "killing" any guru. That is a ridiculous charge that has been refuted completely and repeatedly. Please conduct your own research on this issue. Don't believe in me."

Notice that Baba has now been transformed into a Swami by the wave of the Sanjeev Sabhlok magic wand  of verbal jugglery.

How Sanjeev Sabhlok has satisfied himself entirely that Swami Ramdev is totally above board is not specified anywhere by him.

And raising  Swami/Baba Ramdev 'above the board' is not an easy task, for the charges and accusations against this person are many, varied and grave and not to be dismissed by a wave of a hand or casual remark as Sanjeev Sabhlok has tried to do.

These are:

  1. Baba Ramdev is involved in tax evasion.
  2. Baba Ramdev exports products that are banned in the United States.
  3. Donations received by Baba Ramdev consist of black money and are not accounted for properly.
  4. His aide and right-hand man 'Acharya' Balkrishna has fake passport papers.
  5. Acharya Balkrishna is a Nepali criminal who fled from Nepal to India.
  6. Acharya Balkrishna has violated the Arms Act, 1959.
  7. Ramdev and his non-profit firms are alleged to involve in activities prohibited for non-profit tax-exempt organisations in USA.[66] 
  8. Labour law violations and animal parts in medicines 
  9.  False claims on curing Cancer and AIDS though Yoga and Ayurveda

The following civil/criminal cases have been filed/under process against him/his aides:

  • The Enforcement Directorate (ED) registered a foreign exchange violation case against Baba Ramdev and his trust. The Directorate has found evidence of Ramdev and his trusts receiving financial aid from the USA, Britain and New Zealand. Ramdev and his trust reportedly received Rs 7 crore from Britain. The ED has formally registered a case under the provisions of Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA). Investigations by the ED have found foreign remittances and inflow of funds to Ramdev and his various trusts including the Patanjali Yogpeeth Trust and Divya Yoga Mandir Trust. 
  •   The Central Bureau of Investigation has  registered two cases against Yoga guru Ramdev's close aide Balkrishna for allegedly using a fake degree for getting a passport.While one case has been registered under Section 420 (cheating) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code for procuring the fake degree, the other was for violation of Section 12 of the Indian Passport Act (knowingly furnishing false documents), CBI officials said. 
  •  The Government has slapped a notice of Rs. 5 crore demand on trusts run by yoga guru Baba Ramdev in connection with alleged service tax evasion while organising yoga camps.Claiming that shivirs (camps) undertaken by Patanjali Yoga Peeth and Divya Yoga Trust in Haridwar were commercial activity, the Revenue department has raised a demand of Rs. 5.14 crore payable on fees collected from individuals for learning Yoga, officials said."The Directorate General of Central Excise Intelligence has sent notices for alleged service tax evasion to the tune of Rs. 5.14 crore late last month. The demands have been raised for its assessment for period between 2007-08 and 2011-12," a Finance Ministry official said.

There could surely be some political vendetta and witch-hunting behind some of this, all of which may not stick to Ramdev, but the instances of misconduct relating to Baba Ramdev are too numerous to just dismissed or brushed off easily.

Beyond all that, is the charge of quackery and defrauding of public by dubious claims of  efficacy of yoga routines and peddling of ayurvedic products of questionable quality, potency and efficacy

Posted 13th January by