Sanjeev Sabhlok's "Hindutva Terror" agenda and Baba Ramdev exposed

Friends

Please read these messages from Brother Sanjeev Sabhlok in reply to a "well intentioned Indian" who posed pointed queries to our fallen (and now expelled) Brother. See how evasive our Brother is after he has come under Baba Ramdev's mind control.

Brother Sanjeev (blinded by ego and maya) perhaps does not yet realise that Baba Ramdev is well known in police circles to be a seasoned Anand Margi with a terror agenda whose yoga centres and shops are used as revolutionary outlets .

SKC's local sources report FTI 4 June rally is "Baba Ramdev production" with thousands of hired extras from Hanuman Mandir (time of Tuesday afternoon was chosen for this purpose) and nearby Jamuna Pushta slums.

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Sanjeev Sabhlok <sabhlok@gmail.com> wrote:

FTI, NRS, SKC, SKCF, TRM. What's all this!

On June 3, 2013, by Sanjeev Sabhlok

A well-intentioned Indian asked a few questions today. I have replied. Since both the question and answer may be relevant to some people, I'm publishing them both.

QUESTION

Firstly, what is SKC – a political party? a pressure group?
The website under "About Us" talks of Head Office first and National Reform Summit under Activities, without mentioning what is SKC in the first place and how it will implement its agenda.

Even if the SKC agenda is alright, is there a need for SKC in the first place? Isn't FTI itself good enough? You could have simply diluted the LIBERAL stance of FTI if at all it was necessary.

Now, SKC is perhaps backed by people like Baba Ramdev (or is it the other way around?) And it is debatable whether such people are both secular and liberal e.g. Baba Ramdev has aired his anti-MNC view several times.

Also, now with a proliferation of organisations and movements, there is too much confusion even in basic statements. You say SKCF was formed after NRS, when the NRS invite itself was on SKC website.

MY RESPONSE

FTI is PURELY meant for liberal leaders. It does not (under any circumstance) accept someone who doesn't promote liberty. It will never become a political party. It is the driver of all these activities that you see.

NRS was organised primarily by FTI but in collaboration with BST and others. We were the promoter of the idea, we organised it, and were supported by Swami Ramev. Without his assistance NRS could never have been held. India must be eternally grateful to Swami Ramdev's large heart that he engages with a wide range of good people.

We had created SKCF in end-March IN ANTICIPATION of approval by NRS. Its real beginning was only when NRS participants voted to join it.

SKCF is a FEDERATION. FTI is its secretary. Please read its trust deed. It is an aggregator of individuals, NGOs, political parties and companies that want reform. For the first year its membership is free.

SKCF is now organising this Sone Ki Chidiya movement. It is running on the work of FTI (not Swami Ramdev, although I hope he supports this work: I have the most cordial relationship with him). We do not intend to have a one-off event. This is a sustained movement.

Just like FTI will not come to an end, so also SKCF will not come to an end. The task at hand for these organisations is perennial. SKCF, because it allows a wider range of people to participate, is NOT entirely liberal. In fact, even on FTI there are debates about liberalism. Liberalism is not something like a Bible. It is a way of thinking about things. It is like the scientific method. Its conclusions can change over time, within a fairly wide ambit. SKCF is largely liberal. It will accommodate somewhat illiberal threads to the extent the overall agenda is not adversely affected. It is about taking the message of good governance to India, and such things can't be done "perfectly". There has to be some give and take.

Trust that clarifies.